- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 38,580
- Liked Posts:
- 26,976
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
DEFEATI can't do this.
DEFEATI can't do this.
Bro, all you mention is PFF
It's what you back your argument on in every single thread for years now.
It's like you are paid by them, but instead you pay them to give you garbage grades.
There is nothing wrong with referencing pff from time to time, but you legit use it as your end all be all.
And no, I don't think that everyone who disagrees with me is wrong. I just think you are wrong, almost always.
I'm with you. If you find a solid nfl starter for a decade, I consider that a hit in the first round. You obviously want more, but the majority of first rounders that are "successes" are not probowlers, but just "really solid starters".
I’d rather move up for Wilson or Lance than get Prince Henry Wentz. I’d even rather have Marriotta then Wentz. The guy has never looked the same since the ACL
Floyd has never achieved a 70 grade but yes he has been just below. What you are ignoring of course is how that grade is aligned with his Bears. He was the 39th, 44th, 37th, and 31st graded Edge in his 4 years with the Bears. So always below average to average. McGlinchey has clearly been better in his time with the Niners as again he as graded 22nd, 32nd, and 19th at T.
The reality is McGlinchey and Bosa are much better than White, Floyd, 4M and Quan.
When we had the debate about Mack you claimed that the players, coaches and writers that voted him to the Pro Bowl and All Pro teams didn't matter. So it doesn't matter what one picks, you always will deny it if it disagrees with your opinion.
I use PFF because none of us watch enough of other teams to make a comparison. So it is an independent source rather than you preferred method of saying someone is good or bad because you said so.
The reality is you just adjust your rules to whatever suits your narrative.
All pro is voted by writers.
Thats all I stated. You said it doesn't contain bias because its all pro, but it does, because it's voted by 50 journalists.....
All pro has merit, but its got plenty of bias as well.
I'll gladly throw up the white flag here. This is exhausting. Once we start using our own definitions of words, I'm out. I always think of George Carlin when he said "Try to pay attention to the language we all agreed on"DEFEAT
Legit, what you just said about "us not watching enough nfl football" could also apply to pff.
Their grading system is as real as Maddens.
Fair enough. Either way it wasn't me that brought it up as DaBitch suggested.
Your original narrative was Floyd was a bust. My reply was perennial starters are not busts.No rules were adjusted. McGlinchey is clearly a better player for the Niners than Floyd was for the Bears.
Hahaha don't be mad....or should i say don't be a little remybrat.
That is just a rationalization to explain the fuck up in not drafting Claypool. The reality is Kmet looks like a checkdown TE. He simply does not have the speed or fluidity to stretch teams down the field as he is more lumbering than he is fast or agile.
Remy literally is always wrong, and the only thing he ever has to say about it is that PFF grades this player such and such, so he's not wrong because PFF.
Your original narrative was Floyd was a bust. My reply was perennial starters are not busts.
Is McGlinchey an all pro? Has he ever graded top 15? Was he worthy of a top 10 pick? If so why was he worthy of the pick. Because hes a perennial starter.
No rules were adjusted. McGlinchey is clearly a better player for the Niners than Floyd was for the Bears.
I'll gladly throw up the white flag here. This is exhausting. Once we start using our own definitions of words, I'm out. I always think of George Carlin when he said "Try to pay attention to the language we all agreed on"
Athleticism, brute strength, hands, work ethic, blocking.
Anyone expecting him to have a great season stats wise was always setting the bar too high. He started one year in college. He was taken as a massive upside/potential TE option. So far, from what I've seen, he's been getting better every week.
He will be our next young QB's best friend. Guy has a massive catch radius and is impossible to bring down.
He does love using stats to judge a players output which is true ignorance.
I think wentz has the highest upside(besides watson) of anyone we can get this offseason. Dak isn't a possibility.
Issue is, I don't like giving up picks for him. I don't like the contract, and I don't think he's going to be old wentz ever again.
Yes and my response was Floyd was a below average to average starter which can still be considered a bust. Hence why I brought up Thomas Jones with the Cards. He started but is still considered a bust for the Cards because he wasn't all that good.
I never claimed one needed to be a Pro Bowler or All Pro. I claimed you actually needed to be a good starter which Floyd was not for the Bears. Hence why I pointed out that McGlinchey is an elite run blocker. Emphasis on elite. Floyd was never elite in anything he did with the Bears. He was a jack of all trades, master of none which ended up with him being an imminently replaceable player for us.
In short, your error is in assuming all non-Pro Bowl starters are the same. They are not. There is a huge difference between being a mediocre starter (Floyd) vs being an actual good starter (McGlinchey).