You literally just said Kmet wasn’t 1 on 1 a few posts ago but in reality it was a 1 on 1 rush because the defender got outside like he should have done. So can you please explain how Kmet cost the Bears the game? Or can you explain how stupid that comment was?
Coming from the guy who said Kmet cost the Bears the game
The score was 14-9 before the sack. That play definitely cost us the game given without it a TD puts us ahead instead of down 21-16. It obviously was not the only thing that cost us.
Kmet has inside help but still slides inside which makes no sense. Lewis does the right thing in making sure he is pushing Latu towards his help and not letting him get on his right shoulder.
Kmet should know Lewis is going to push Latu towards his help so again no idea why he would slide so far right and risk Latu getting to the outside of his left shoulder.
It is also clear from the All 22 that 23 fakes blitzing which is why Lewis comes off so again this seems like the right technique. Lewis pushes him toward his help Kmet and then checks in case 23 is running a delayed blitz. If he isnt and Kmet maintained outside leverage then Latu would be forced back inside where Lewis can help on him again if need be. But Kmet moves so far inside that he overlaps with Lewis which allows Latu to get outside leverage. No way Lewis can help once Kmet lets him get to his outside shoulder.
So dont know what to tell you. If you disagree then explain in detail why.