- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
This trade adds fuel to my prediction of the 2012 Cubs chasing the 62 Mets
Really think Zambrano is going to significantly outproduce what Volstad has done so far in his career this year?
This trade adds fuel to my prediction of the 2012 Cubs chasing the 62 Mets
It's not about what you or I want. It's about what Tom Ricketts wants. And right now, Ricketts is doing things the way he wants to. I hope they work for him.Did I say that it was because of their nationalities? However, the main focal points of fans' ire were players of one ethnicity (which would be more accurate to say than nationality since Zambrano is Venezuelan and Ramirez and Soriano are Dominican).
You got your way, and they are gone. Now allow me to be happy that finally we can focus on real problems facing this team and not these invented reasons for poor performances of this club (which is the one thing I actually do care about when it comes to this team).
It's not about what you or I want. It's about what Tom Ricketts wants. And right now, Ricketts is doing things the way he wants to. I hope they work for him.
There may be a long rebuilding road ahead, but I think it will be worth it in the end to replenish the farm now, and let aging veterans go.
This trade adds fuel to my prediction of the 2012 Cubs chasing the 62 Mets
Why he would ever use it, but he could use his NTC to **** the cubs and make them pay him to do absolutely nothing. If you are the Cubs you want to trade him somewhere he will want to play, he likes ozzie so he will play there. I'm sure he would waive it anywhere to play, instead of sit. But if you are the Cubs you make sure its somewhere he will want to go.
right so losing an aging,declining hothead(who basically quit on the team) for a solid young pitcher is going to make the cubs worse?
you do realize this is 2012 and not 2008?
I know Z pretty much wore out his welcome. And that most Cubs fans wanted him gone.... But don't you think we could have done better than Volstad AND paying his full salary?
I know Z pretty much wore out his welcome. And that most Cubs fans wanted him gone.... But don't you think we could have done better than Volstad AND paying his full salary?
This is pretty much a break-even trade. Z had essentially negative trade value and maybe Theo/Jed thought they had the personnel and strategies in place to fix Volstad.
He sort of has a point. If Volstad doesn't have a rebound year, he's not that much better and possibly even worse than Z.
right so losing an aging,declining hothead(who basically quit on the team) for a solid young pitcher is going to make the cubs worse?
you do realize this is 2012 and not 2008?
How many kids do you have?Uh Volstad is far from solid. Career ERA near 4.60 son.
Uh Volstad is far from solid. Career ERA near 4.60 son.
ERAs don't tell you everything about a pitcher. Especially if the sample size is small.
He's thrown almost 600 innings, Uman. That's a fairly big sample size. The good news is that he doesn't walk a lot of people and he leans towards being a ground ball pitcher, so if they can help him induce more grounders and shore up the defense, he can actually work out.
I know. Just trying to make a joke. :lol:
He's thrown almost 600 innings, Uman. That's a fairly big sample size. The good news is that he doesn't walk a lot of people and he leans towards being a ground ball pitcher, so if they can help him induce more grounders and shore up the defense, he can actually work out.
We were good at defense when you played Ernie :tongue:Would a lot of ground balls be a good thing? Seeing how we led the majors in errors and all.