DE Willie Young signs with Bears 3 years 9 million

swz01

Active member
Joined:
Mar 11, 2014
Posts:
868
Liked Posts:
212
Getting pressure from the 3-tech will help more than anything. They either need Melton to come back and be in 2012 form or draft a guy that can apply that kind of pressure.

Forget Melton, Donald!
 

modo

Based
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
29,628
Liked Posts:
24,178
Location:
USA
Are you seriously implying that this guy made Detroit's line better?

I did not say that at all.....I was just pointing out the sack stat can be scewed as well.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
60,831
Liked Posts:
39,202
Getting pressure from the 3-tech will help more than anything. They either need Melton to come back and be in 2012 form or draft a guy that can apply that kind of pressure.

I don't disagree with that either. Again, I don't really care where the pass rush comes from as long as it comes. However, I still would like another pass rushing DE as I am not keen on the idea of relying on some combination of Bass/Washington/McClellin as our 3rd DE. Our 3rd DE will play a lot.
 

ImLittleJon

New member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
69
Liked Posts:
26
If the Bears had a bunch of guys like [Seattle's] then I would not have said what I said. Instead, I noted they have Houston, Young, Shea and Bass. There is no comparison. If you are going to roll with guys like that then yes I think you need a guy who is a legit 10 sack a year guy. It doesn't mean he will actually get 10 sacks because he may not play enough snaps to do so in a rotation but it means he is a guy that teams fear from a pass rush perspective.

No one on our roster would really scare teams as it stands now. Again, we are heading in the right direction and I have no probablem with the signings given how things unfolded but just because Emery has made due with the cards he was dealt doesn't mean the pass rush isn't still an issue. I think it still is and so we still need to add a legit pass rushing threat IMO.

One thing to note is that both Houston and Young have reputations as strong run defenders. If our D can stop one facet, that's one more than they could stop last year. I would certainly like to have a pass rush as well, but I'm pretty content with the DEs at this point.
 

fatbeard

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2013
Posts:
13,193
Liked Posts:
11,018
Why are we not addressing holes with long term solutions then?

And how many long term solutions were available via FA this year? Quit being dense.

All these guys look like stop gaps or transition players to me.

Perhaps because that's all that hit the market this year. Greg Hardy got tagged. Orakpo (who is good, not great) got tagged. Michael Bennett? Good but not great, and not a long-term solution at 29. Michael Johnson? A bit younger but still good not great. Ware? Over the hill. Allen? Over the hill. Jarius Byrd? Overpaid. T.J. Ward? Wanted to play on a guaranteed win-now team. Mitchell? The Steelers stupidly overpaid. Revis? A cover corner coming off an ACL for 10mil? No thanks.

You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit, and that's what the FA market was this year. How is that Emery's fault?
 

nvanprooyen

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 4, 2011
Posts:
18,747
Liked Posts:
27,277
Location:
Volusia County, FL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
I don't disagree with that either. Again, I don't really care where the pass rush comes from as long as it comes. However, I still would like another pass rushing DE as I am not keen on the idea of relying on some combination of Bass/Washington/McClellin as our 3rd DE. Our 3rd DE will play a lot.

No matter how good the ends are....if there is somewhere to step up into because there is no push up the middle, it makes it way harder to generate consistent pressure. We need a stud DT. If we don't sign Melton, I gotta think DT is our #1 pick.
 

-Cago34-

CCS Mock Draft Champion
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
7,467
Liked Posts:
7,264
Location:
Booty
I'm on board with this signing. Emery didn't have dozens of millions to play with so what the fuck did you guys expect?

Anyways - does anyone have any stats on how Young did versus the run?
 

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
8,248
Liked Posts:
7,971
Location:
Mom's Basement
pessimism is too high.

The eye of Sauron (emery) is fixated on safety and defensive line, therefore you can expect multiple "fixes" just like last year at linebacker and o-line. That means free agency splash, free agency mop up, early pick, and late pick.

The guy solves problems in one off-season not 3.

But it looks like more seams could burst at corner, linebacker again, and OT or back-up QB if injury strikes.

What I haven't seen yet is the foresight to see a bursting seem and fix it ahead of time. DT was a major need last year.

I don't think it is fair to have expected emery to anticipate the DT issues of last year. Who thought Melton and Collins would go down to acls in back to back weeks? That would cripple any team. Even with that he made a good mid year signing with Ratliff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

swz01

Active member
Joined:
Mar 11, 2014
Posts:
868
Liked Posts:
212
And how many long term solutions were available via FA this year? Quit being dense.



Perhaps because that's all that hit the market this year. Greg Hardy got tagged. Orakpo (who is good, not great) got tagged. Michael Bennett? Good but not great, and not a long-term solution at 29. Michael Johnson? A bit younger but still good not great. Ware? Over the hill. Allen? Over the hill. Jarius Byrd? Overpaid. T.J. Ward? Wanted to play on a guaranteed win-now team. Mitchell? The Steelers stupidly overpaid. Revis? A cover corner coming off an ACL for 10mil? No thanks.

You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit, and that's what the FA market was this year. How is that Emery's fault?

It's clear you are dead set on defending Emery instead of evaluating the quality of his moves. The reason he couldn't land more than one impact defenders is because he handcuffed the team with the Cutler contract. Whether or not it was the right move, we will soon find out.

I will argue that Trestman's system is good enough that we could have signed McCown and gotten a QB in the draft that would fit his system that would be more than competent by the time we finished the rebuild on defense at a much cheaper cost! Instead we will end up with a franchise QB who could be close to the downside of his career by the end of the rebuild
 

Jailbreak

Block someone
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
5,139
Liked Posts:
806
Location:
Asheville, NC
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Very hard to do in a year, especially with the dead money. The draft is more important this year than in recent memory.
 

Bear Pride

Bears Gonna Shock the World!
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
10,616
Liked Posts:
3,093
O man. 3 sack king and Lamar with 6 .. That is one force for DE. I'm ready for the Emery-ites to come at anyone criticizing his moves. Like Emery a lot n he better hope this pans out on D. On the upswing or not, he hasn't done much.

This guy does exactly what Allen would do for the Bears.
 

Bear Pride

Bears Gonna Shock the World!
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
10,616
Liked Posts:
3,093
Seattle didn't have a 10-sack a year guy last season!

(Before anyone goes bananas, I'm not saying that the 2014 Bears will be the 2013 Seahawks. I'm saying that you can provide a decent pass rush without a 10-sack-a-year guy.)

It's funny you use them as an example, cuz Emery looked to Seattle's defense as building block for the Bears new defense. He said as much himself. Emery is creating pass rush as a unit. What we've done in the past is take a mediocre DL and add 1 or 2 pass rushers and expect it to fix all. Adding a 20 sack guy to a mediocre DL won't fix it.

BUT, putting together 4 to 5 guys, as a unit, can fix the pass rush. It's not a coincidence that both DE's we signed excelled at pressures. Now, add 4 guys like this and you've got yourself a pass rush ..... just like Seattle did it last year.
 

94SupraTT

Spoilers!
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,150
Liked Posts:
1,534
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
@PFF: Willie Young has sacked the QB just 8 times in his career, but his 60 total pressures last year was just 4 fewer than CAR's Charles Johnson

If Suh collapses the pocket and the qb is flushed to Young who gets credit for the hurry?


Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
 

fatbeard

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2013
Posts:
13,193
Liked Posts:
11,018
It's clear you are dead set on defending Emery instead of evaluating the quality of his moves. The reason he couldn't land more than one impact defenders is because he handcuffed the team with the Cutler contract. Whether or not it was the right move, we will soon find out.

The Cutler contract, just like every contract the Bears sign, is fluid. They all contain a clause whereby the Bears can convert any portion of the player's salary into a signing bonus spread over the remainder of the contract in order to free up cap room in the present year. They can do this at any time for any reason without the player's approval. It's a pay as they go system if they want to free up more room for more signings. Cutler's contract, by its very nature, can only handcuff the team to the extent that they want it to.

So again, quit being dense.
 

Bear Pride

Bears Gonna Shock the World!
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
10,616
Liked Posts:
3,093
Why are we not addressing holes with long term solutions then? How many drafts do you think it will take to fill out the D given Emery's current draft success rate? I'd say at least 3

All these guys look like stop gaps or transition players to me.

You mean until the next couple years when the Bears have much more cap money? :shrug: ... :smh:
 

Bear Pride

Bears Gonna Shock the World!
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
10,616
Liked Posts:
3,093
Cause all the attention goes to Suh and Fairley and their ends can't win one on one matchups

Or their DB's suck and opposing QB's get rid of the ball before the pressure gets there.
 

Gemini13

New member
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
58
Liked Posts:
1
It's clear you are dead set on defending Emery instead of evaluating the quality of his moves. The reason he couldn't land more than one impact defenders is because he handcuffed the team with the Cutler contract. Whether or not it was the right move, we will soon find out.

I will argue that Trestman's system is good enough that we could have signed McCown and gotten a QB in the draft that would fit his system that would be more than competent by the time we finished the rebuild on defense at a much cheaper cost! Instead we will end up with a franchise QB who could be close to the downside of his career by the end of the rebuild

You didn't answer is question though my friend. I'm curious as to what your answer is?
 

The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2014
Posts:
18,007
Liked Posts:
3,238
Location:
Southern California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
This reminds me of the Slauson signing in the same way that that Houston reminded me of the Bushrod signing. Phil is very cognizant of getting guys that are the right fit and for good value. Now if only he can get another rookie pro bowler!!


That is how I view it also. Good stuff:)
 

Top