For Those Not Wanting Fox as HC

Nail Polish

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,693
Liked Posts:
10,461
We shook up the barrel when we hired Trestman..How did that turn out?

Well, they were going to change the face of the franchise from a defensive team to an offensive juggernaut...lol..After that failed experiment...BRING ON FOX!!

Yeah, therefore we must conform to the status quo. Trestman was so out of the realm of conventional thinking it defies explanation. At least the "longshot" assistants being discussed have recent nfl experience and ties.....

Right, cause Fox doesnt

Dude, get a clue.....the comparison was made in regards to Trestman and the current list of assistants being discussed......


what a ******.




When you said...BEING discussed...That means the here and now...Not the Trestman era
DOOOOOD... You should make yourself clearer...Put down the doobie and join the clear thinking DOOOOD
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
18,979
Liked Posts:
4,695
When you said...BEING discussed...That means the here and now...Not the Trestman era
DOOOOOD... You should make yourself clearer...Put down the doobie and join the clear thinking DOOOOD

Likewise, if you want to quote me fine, but unless you do so with reference to what the quote was a response to, it is totally out of context. Is that so hard for you to understand or should I get out my crayons and draw you a picture?
 

Nail Polish

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,693
Liked Posts:
10,461
Likewise, if you want to quote me fine, but unless you do so with reference to what the quote was a response to, it is totally out of context. Is that so hard for you to understand or should I get out my crayons and draw you a picture?

My response was correct in the context of your post stating "Being Discussed" That indicates "CURRENTLY"

Spare us the crayons DOOOOD, save em for class
 

FoCo

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
489
Liked Posts:
641
Omeletpants;1991004 Quinn has always had a reputation of being flexible with schemes and fitting in players into those schemes. His players love him. Additionally said:
Fox won a playoff game with Tebow. Broncos beat the Chiefs in a game where they completed one pass the entire game. Under Fox the Broncos also threw 55 touchdowns in one year. It doesn't get more flexible with schemes and fitting players into schemes that fit them more than that.

The position to shake up the barrel and shoot for potential excellence was after Lovie got fired and the Bears missed miserably. The Bears have to get back to where Lovie had them before they can take that shot again. Another miss with an unknown coach like Quinn would send the franchise back another six years.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
18,979
Liked Posts:
4,695
Crayon time for our reading impaired........

We shook up the barrel when we hired Trestman..How did that turn out?

Yeah, therefore we must conform to the status quo. Trestman was so out of the realm of conventional thinking it defies explanation. At least the "longshot" assistants being discussed have recent nfl experience and ties.....


My response was correct in the context of your post stating "Being Discussed" That indicates "CURRENTLY"

Spare us the crayons DOOOOD, save em for class

My response clearly indicated the assistants being discussed were indeed current (ie quin, Austin, etc).
 

Nail Polish

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,693
Liked Posts:
10,461
yup..hence my response about Fox was correct...You lose
 

NCChiFan

Bald, fat, toothless
Donator
Joined:
Mar 29, 2012
Posts:
10,913
Liked Posts:
4,802
This thread is the problem with a Fox hire. Cherry picking stats. Fact is, he was both great and horrific in Carolina. Which Fox are the Bears getting? Same could be said in Denver, he had Manning and couldn't get it done. Now, Fox also had Jake Delhomme and went to the Superbowl. Again, which Fox are we getting?

Personally, I think he will help solidify this team, calm things down, allow Pace to really evaluate what the Bears are and where they're at. Give him a great chance at fixing holes, honest holes. But I don't see Fox as a long term solution. He's been to up and down.
 

Nail Polish

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,693
Liked Posts:
10,461
This thread is the problem with a Fox hire. Cherry picking stats. Fact is, he was both great and horrific in Carolina. Which Fox are the Bears getting? Same could be said in Denver, he had Manning and couldn't get it done. Now, Fox also had Jake Delhomme and went to the Superbowl. Again, which Fox are we getting?

Personally, I think he will help solidify this team, calm things down, allow Pace to really evaluate what the Bears are and where they're at. Give him a great chance at fixing holes, honest holes. But I don't see Fox as a long term solution. He's been to up and down.

If Fox can get us back to 500 or better,he did his job
 

jc456

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
4,618
Liked Posts:
844
We shook up the barrel when we hired Trestman..How did that turn out?

Trestman was out of the nfl for how long? red flag. Maybe the fact that no one else wanted him was also a red flag. So the Bears ignored the two most obvious points in a new hire in football. Well I ask, how stupid was that? He is fired. dah...

Let's don't forget, Lovie Smith was a no experience guy, Mike Ditka was as well. Both took the Bears to playoffs and SB. One got a victory one didn't.

IMO, Fox is past his prime. Seems that doesn't matter to some. To me, it does. Doesn't make me right. Anyone can fail, experience or not. But to look past the obvious red flags of a candidate and hiring said candidate is not a smart move in my world in any business.

I say let's bring in new blood. Creative blood.

I have no reason to doubt a Pace move today and I will not argue his ultimate choice. But a year after hire, will be the point when criticism will start if failure is repeated.

I am from the stop the stupid program.
 

Nail Polish

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,693
Liked Posts:
10,461
Trestman was out of the nfl for how long? red flag. Maybe the fact that no one else wanted him was also a red flag. So the Bears ignored the two most obvious points in a new hire in football. Well I ask, how stupid was that? He is fired. dah...

Let's don't forget, Lovie Smith was a no experience guy, Mike Ditka was as well. Both took the Bears to playoffs and SB. One got a victory one didn't.

IMO, Fox is past his prime. Seems that doesn't matter to some. To me, it does. Doesn't make me right. Anyone can fail, experience or not. But to look past the obvious red flags of a candidate and hiring said candidate is not a smart move in my world in any business.

I say let's bring in new blood. Creative blood.

I have no reason to doubt a Pace move today and I will not argue his ultimate choice. But a year after hire, will be the point when criticism will start if failure is repeated.

I am from the stop the stupid program.

I agree with the bolded
 

NCChiFan

Bald, fat, toothless
Donator
Joined:
Mar 29, 2012
Posts:
10,913
Liked Posts:
4,802
If Fox can get us back to 500 or better,he did his job

I think he would do even better than that. But get our Bears back to the Superbowl??? Better pray he grabs the correct assistants or it is Lovie & Trestman all over again.
 

Top