- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 62,616
- Liked Posts:
- 40,101
From your link..
"The Dunning–Kruger effect is defined as the tendency of people with low ability in a specific area to give overly positive assessments of this ability.[2][3][4] This is often seen as a cognitive bias, i.e. as a systematic tendency to engage in erroneous forms of thinking and judging."
Another fail from Remy.
So yeah your Thinking and Judging that it takes no skill puts you at the top of the confidence in your "judging"
Now are you and expert Bear Hunter? No? Well your not to the right of the scale now are you? In fact your complete lake of any Bear hunting experience puts you all the way to the left..
You cant comprend. Per the first sentence Dunning Kruger requires me to have low ability in something and offer an overly positive assessment of my ability in it. So lets say I have low ability in hunting. I never offered an overly positive assessment of my hunting abilities so Dunning Kruger does not apply.
So even if you want to say my thinking is flawed or erroneous it isnt because of Dunning Kruger as I dont meet both requirements. Once again at no point did I make any claim of how good I was at hunting.
To make this simple quote where I gave myself an overly positive assessment of my hunting abilities?
Finally your 2whole argument has changed. You have moved goal posts as follows.How much hunting have you actually done to make the claim there is no skill?
Is it more skill to pay someone else to kill your meat when you buy steaks from the grocery store?
1. First it was about my hunting experience.
2. Then when I gave it you switched to no large game experience.
3. Then when your dumbass realized wild boar are large game you switched to well I was just a kid.
4. Then when I pointed out I said I still hunted them as an adult you switched to well it is not large game because wild boar arent native America.
5. When you realized how stupid that sounds now it is well boar are not bears.
You should coach Santos.
Last edited: