Kane, Hammer Approve Of Blackhawks Offseason

[icehogfan08]

what!? you are going to use Chelios as a comparison? a HOF player vs a guy. WOW!

9-10 games huh? so we should assume he would have topped 50 points? ok.

Yep, look what happened when Hossa played injured, his linemates and himelf where non-existant. When Koivu is your star player and you have played 3 years with the same guy you lose chemistry.

2010-2011 Koivu missed 11 games had 62 points
2010-2011 Brunette played every game and finished with 46 points

2009-2010 Koivu missed 2 games had 71 points
2009-2010 Brunette played every game and finished with 61 points

 

[icehogfan08]

you are just as fucking stupid for agreeing with that non sense of a post. chelios compared to brunette. that is classic.

Didn't compare them, was just stating that you dont knowat wht age aplayer is done. nothing did I say about Chelios and Brunett being in tesme elite group. for all we know Brunette can play til hes 46. Again you have to find other ways out when we give you the stats and you cant argue them, why don't you and joe go play with each others cawks and drool over goal and assist categories

 

[icehogfan08]

you really need to learn to read.........

you were trying to debunk my argument of him being on a better line by saying he wasnt on such a bad line anyway...

He will be on a better line (proven true by your favorite "points" stat for top 6 forwards), and you honestly think he wont be as effective?


And all of Koivu's assists were to Brunette? I wasnt aware he scored 45 goals

In Minny he had Koivu, Chicago he has Sharp, Hossa, Kane, and Toews, it doesn't get any better than that

 

[Capt. Serious]

Brunette finished behind PA Parenteau in points.

But, he'll start skating faster because he's here.

 

[icehogfan08]

Brunette finished behind PA Parenteau in points.

But, he'll start skating faster because he's here.

Versteeg finished bhind him, so he sucks as well, and where the hell did you get anything about skating? Yeah, he may be a bad skater but wecan expect him to produce, no run along joecawks cause we know you wont answer, you'll have to wait for dewey

 

[DewsSox79]

Didn't compare them, was just stating that you dont knowat wht age aplayer is done. nothing did I say about Chelios and Brunett being in tesme elite group. for all we know Brunette can play til hes 46. Again you have to find other ways out when we give you the stats and you cant argue them, why don't you and joe go play with each others cawks and drool over goal and assist categories

again, if you are in the top 6 you better have a descent stat line. this isnt rocket science.

what amazing stats are we even talking about here? he had 18 fucking goals....whooopeee!!!

Wasnt the "stats" the reason why i said stalberg is not a top 6 forward? just askin.

But I want to stay on topic with brunette. so lets talk about this guy brunette for a bit. So he had a whopping 18 goals ( of course on this bad team ). So him being on the hawks makes us that much better? so we essentially replace brouwers 17 goals with brunettes, so how is this not a wash?

 

[icehogfan08]

again, if you are in the top 6 you better have a descent stat line. this isnt rocket science.

what amazing stats are we even talking about here? he had 18 fucking goals....whooopeee!!!

Wasnt the "stats" the reason why i said stalberg is not a top 6 forward? just askin.

But I want to stay on topic with brunette. so lets talk about this guy brunette for a bit. So he had a whopping 18 goals ( of course on this bad team ). So him being on the hawks makes us that much better? so we essentially replace brouwers 17 goals with brunettes, so how is this not a wash?

Probably because he is not here to score the goals. Let m break it down for you, and i'll even quote the scouting reports on him.

ASSETS: Has great offensive instincts. Can set up plays and finish them off with equal zest. Is very creative with the puck and positionally sound. Does great work around the opponents' crease.

Oh look, his reputaion has him as a playmaker, hmmm wonder what Hossa has been missng on the other side of the ice.

Oh my look, he creates opportunities in the crease, hmmm th Hawks wheremissing that last year without Buff.

Oh whats that? he's here to play with Hossa and set him up, and screen the goalie on powerplays. Thats why he has all those assists and most of his goals come when he is on the powerplay.

 

[DewsSox79]

Probably because he is not here to score the goals. Let m break it down for you, and i'll even quote the scouting reports on him.



Oh look, his reputaion has him as a playmaker, hmmm wonder what Hossa has been missng on the other side of the ice.

Oh my look, he creates opportunities in the crease, hmmm th Hawks wheremissing that last year without Buff.

Oh whats that? he's here to play with Hossa and set him up, and screen the goalie on powerplays. Thats why he has all those assists and most of his goals come when he is on the powerplay.

so now he is going to fill the void of buff. ok.

 

[DewsSox79]

Id be willing to bet my life that if brunette was signed by the nucks you 2 idiots would be making fun of the canucks. brunette is a guy, nothing special, just an aging 37 year old player.

 

[tbo41fan]

so now he is going to fill the void of buff. ok.

Hes not going to completely replace him, but will help fill the void...


your angry at Stalberg getting signed because all he can do is skate fast, but the Brunette, who has proven to be a facotr in multiple aspects, you still hate...what would you have done different?

 

[tbo41fan]

Id be willing to bet my life that if brunette was signed by the nucks you 2 idiots would be making fun of the canucks. brunette is a guy, nothing special, just an aging 37 year old player.

well you would be dead since I actually watch hockey and knew Brunette was a good piece before he signed

 

[icehogfan08]

so now he is going to fill the void of buff. ok.

Again you fail at taking what he does, never said he was going to be a buff, simply stated he makes a presence in the crease. You post after we give you the stat facts and post something totally diffrent than what we even tealk about. Wouldn't you agree the Hawks missed that last year.

 

[icehogfan08]

And if I recall, I was wanting him at the trade deadine last season.

 

[Capt. Serious]

I swear does Stan Bowman do no wrong to you?

 

[icehogfan08]

I swear does Stan Bowman do no wrong to you?

Answer the questions

 

[tbo41fan]

I swear does Stan Bowman do no wrong to you?

does he do any right to you?

There is a reason he is the GM and your sitting at home on your computer

 

[tbo41fan]

does he do any right to you?

There is a reason he is the GM and your sitting at home on your computer

And not just because of his dad

 

[icehogfan08]

does he do any right to you?

There is a reason he is the GM and your sitting at home on your computer

He's a Ken Holland fan

 

[DewsSox79]

does he do any right to you?

There is a reason he is the GM and your sitting at home on your computer

but you and icehog are sitting at home, and stating that stalberg didnt get top line mins and that is why he didnt produce. but maybe coach q sees that he isnt a top 6 forward. 2 can play this game.

 

[DewsSox79]

Again you fail at taking what he does, never said he was going to be a buff, simply stated he makes a presence in the crease. You post after we give you the stat facts and post something totally diffrent than what we even tealk about. Wouldn't you agree the Hawks missed that last year.

what stat facts? the 18 goals? cmon now....if you are going to play, play hard.