Matt Garza Traded To The Cubs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Juan Pierre deal. Ricky Nolasco looks pretty nice in Florida.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
No, but he brings us closer. I don't think we're all that far away. Sounds like I just gave myself an article idea...




How can you say this is a bad trade before all the players have even been mentioned? That's flat out stupid. Not to even mention, ZERO games have been played. In a deal of 8 players, in which 7 of them are prospects, you can not say that it is extremely good or extremely bad when ZERO games have been played.

But if the Cubs traded Randy Wells, you could call it horrible, right?
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Pierre.

Maddux.

C-patt (questionable)

Those of the top of my head were terrible.

Oh the wuertz trade too.

He'll find a way to say those don't count.
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
But if the Cubs traded Randy Wells, you could call it horrible, right?

Pierre.

Maddux.

C-patt (questionable)

Those of the top of my head were terrible.

Oh the wuertz trade too.

Ouhhh... Forgot about the Maddux trade. God that was bad. Pierre and Wuertz were pretty bad too. However, it has been several years on all of those, which I think is a good sign. In the case of the Pierre deal it was a fire sale, so I can't blame him too much on that one and the only real guy we gave up was Nolasco, IIRC. That Wuertz deal pisses me off beyond belief though, I loved that guy. Didn't he get in someone's dog house? Nevertheless, that one irks me to this day.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
What was the whole trade? I forget who was in it.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Hamilton trade was awful! And to a division rival too.

Granted, he was a Rule V pick, but still!
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
What was the whole trade? I forget who was in it.

Izturis. :puke:

A guy who is a year older than Garza, but has 10+ wins in 4 of his first 5 seasons.

:lmao:

Really?!?! and REALLY?!?!?!!

Awful post.

@Poods, I forgot to quote your post, I think it depends on which WAR you use, right? BR has Nolasco at like 0.1 and FG has him at like 12. I hate the inconsistency between the two.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Mitre nolasco and pinto.

But we basically got harden out of the deal too.

No, I knew that one. I meant the whole Maddux trade.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Izturis. :puke:



Really?!?! and REALLY?!?!?!!

Awful post.

@Poods, I forgot to quote your post, I think it depends on which WAR you use, right? BR has Nolasco at like 0.1 and FG has him at like 12. I hate the inconsistency between the two.

BR is more reliable, if you mean Baseball-Reference, but FG seems to be the trend right now.

So, there are multiple variations of the WAR formula?
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
No, that's because we have Pujols.



I like this and I'm not a prospect hater. While Arch has value to us, he has had one good year of control. That could very easily change. To every scout out there he is nothing special. His ceiling is about a 2, which is what we have with Garza right now. I like the deal.


ATTENTION: Article on this coming soon!

the NL central has some pop.

pooh-holes
braun
fielder
hart
holliday
votto
etc etc
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
BR is more reliable, if you mean Baseball-Reference, but FG seems to be the trend right now.

So, there are multiple variations of the WAR formula?

I don't think BR is more reliable. I forget what it is, but like BR doesn't give credit to luck and FG does? I don't remember, but there is some big factor in there. Gosh, this is gonna drive me crazy.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
I don't think BR is more reliable. I forget what it is, but like BR doesn't give credit to luck and FG does? I don't remember, but there is some big factor in there. Gosh, this is gonna drive me crazy.

IDK, I'm a BR homer, use it as my main resource, mostly for minor league history though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top