Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,700
Liked Posts:
10,512
I would be shocked if the bears stayed at 10. They’re either trading up (jeanty or blockbuster trade for Carter) or moving back.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,390
Liked Posts:
11,896
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
You have two choices and only these two, which one do you choose?

Trade up for Jeanty giving up one of our 2nd rounders and a 2026 3rd?

Taking Tyler Warren or C.Loveland at #10?
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
40,891
Liked Posts:
38,194
Location:
Cumming
For fun, here's some backs that have been taken in the 1st outside of the top 10:

2023: #12 Jahmyr Gibbs
2021: #24 Najee Harris and #25 Travis Etienne
2020: #32 Clyde Edwards-Helaire
2019: #24 Josh Jacobs
2018: #27 Rashaad Penny and #31 Sony Michel
2015: #15 Melvin Gordon
2012: #31 Doug Martin and #32 David Wilson
2011: #31 Mark Ingram
2010: #12 Ryan Mathews and #31 Jahvid Best
Gibbs - Elite
Harris & Etienne -- Meh
CEH - Garbage
Jacobs - Above Average
Penny & Michel -- Garbage
Gordon -- slightly above average
Martin & Wilson -- Garbage
Ingram -- solid career
Mathes & Best -- Garbage
 

Antobears

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 24, 2016
Posts:
1,193
Liked Posts:
621
Location:
Dublin
I'm just checking in on the draft now. Why all the jeanty hate folks? Looks like he has great balance, very quick feet and explosive acceleration. That's my impression based only on highlights only. Was he that much less impressive in games?
 

baredown

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 20, 2013
Posts:
749
Liked Posts:
681
I would be shocked if the bears stayed at 10. They’re either trading up (jeanty or blockbuster trade for Carter) or moving back.
Poles record on draft day pick moves - In three drafts, he's moved up a grand total of once, the small move from 61 to 55 for Stevenson. He's had one lateral pick swap (a 5th {Booker} last year for this year's 4th). And he moved down seven times. So, based on his past trend, Poles is more likely to move down than up. However, he's far more likely to just stay where he is and take who's there...
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,719
Liked Posts:
3,581
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I'm just checking in on the draft now. Why all the jeanty hate folks? Looks like he has great balance, very quick feet and explosive acceleration. That's my impression based only on highlights only. Was he that much less impressive in games?
I think most people don’t hate him. It’s really not about that at all.
 

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
21,019
Liked Posts:
15,024
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
Poles record on draft day pick moves - In three drafts, he's moved up a grand total of once, the small move from 61 to 55 for Stevenson. He's had one lateral pick swap (a 5th {Booker} last year for this year's 4th). And he moved down seven times. So, based on his past trend, Poles is more likely to move down than up. However, he's far more likely to just stay where he is and take who's there...
thanks
 

Myk

85in25
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
12,768
Liked Posts:
5,298
The fact that a running back is being considered in the top 5 is compounded by how he ran all over a poor conference full of guys who won't be playing in the NFL. What's more is that he's not particularly big and not particularly explosive either. What's more than that is when you look at all the top 10 RB draft picks in the last 10 years, none have really translated to team success for the team that drafted the guy.

Trading up for that could end easily be a big disaster, especially when you're a team that's struggled to build the trenches. For as much work as we did there, all you need is another Billings injury and one to Thuney or Dalman and you're in a bad way yet again. For christ's sake, #trenches

Your 3rd point is where you lost me.
To me, if you're a positional value picker your opinion only matters when it's a position you value. For any other position you will always try to find a reason to say no.
I've watched the Bears make up for not having offense (QBs, WRs, and oline) by having a good RB often. What other teams have done with the position doesn't matter. Plus if we have fixed the oline, we have WRs, we have a QB so if a RB falls to us it makes sense that our situation is not the same as other teams who weren't ready.

And the real kicker is I agree about not trading up and focusing on the trenches. Even when I took Jeanty at 10 that was the last I saw anyone for oline that didn't require a lot of scrolling (reaches). He had better be exceptional at running, receiving and blocking if getting him means no real oline options.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,700
Liked Posts:
10,512
Poles record on draft day pick moves - In three drafts, he's moved up a grand total of once, the small move from 61 to 55 for Stevenson. He's had one lateral pick swap (a 5th {Booker} last year for this year's 4th). And he moved down seven times. So, based on his past trend, Poles is more likely to move down than up. However, he's far more likely to just stay where he is and take who's there...

Based on history yes, he’s more likely to trade down than up. We’ll see what happens
 

Myk

85in25
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
12,768
Liked Posts:
5,298
This is a very dramatic take. The only one of those moves that really “set the bears back” was Claypool. Davis was a dud but hardly set them back…Bates cost a 5th and is currently their backup C who could also play OG, assuming he’s healthy.

And Claypool wasn't even a love affair it was a bandaid because Poles ignored the offense for his 2nd year QB.



You have two choices and only these two, which one do you choose?

Trade up for Jeanty giving up one of our 2nd rounders and a 2026 3rd?

Taking Tyler Warren or C.Loveland at #10?

I certainly wouldn't over pay to move up for anyone we would draft so a trade up with your prices isn't happening.
And it's most likely not happening with anyone in this draft because that player isn't there.
It has to be a bidding war to cause an over pay.



I'm just checking in on the draft now. Why all the jeanty hate folks? Looks like he has great balance, very quick feet and explosive acceleration. That's my impression based only on highlights only. Was he that much less impressive in games?

The Bears drafted Enis and Benson. Bears fans are still butt hurt about it so we can never draft another high RB again.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,777
Liked Posts:
23,738
You have two choices and only these two, which one do you choose?

Trade up for Jeanty giving up one of our 2nd rounders and a 2026 3rd?

Taking Tyler Warren or C.Loveland at #10?

Let time run out and forfeit the pick vikings style
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Myk

Top