TC in Mississippi
CCS Staff
- Joined:
- Oct 22, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,305
- Liked Posts:
- 1,816
My point was if they trade for Archer and get nothing when Arrieta walks they really don't have the prospects anymore. Even using my level of value on an Archer trade which is obviously lower than what you think he will go for their system would be left looking something like this
#1 Eloy Jiminez
#2 Dylan Cease
#3 Mark Zaguins
#4 Duane Underwood
#5 Oscar De La Cruz
#6 Trevor Clifton
#7 Jose Albertos
#8 Bryan Hudson
#9 Donnie Dewees
#10 DJ Wilson
#11 Eddy Martinez
#12 Tomas Hatch
#13 Victor Caritini
#14 Jake Stinnett
#15 Pierce Johnson
Now I like a lot of the cubs young arms and especially so with Cease and De La Cruz but you're talking about a lot of gamble on the cubs younger arms. There's talent there but projecting pitching below AA is rather pointless as so much can go wrong be it injury or just not being able to get more advanced batters out. Jiminez is largely the only guy in that group you can reliably put in a trade for any half decent pitcher on the block. And the obvious problem with that is even if they get Archer they still have to replace Lackey after 2017 when FA is likely just as bad. Sure you can go bargain hunting but what made the 2016 cubs so strong was how deep they were in their rotation. And obviously Lester could slow down with another year on him.
So, it's my opinion that if the cubs trade for Archer they aren't going to have much left in the tank.
Which is exactly the argument why, if you trade for Archer, that you trade Arrieta as a concurrent/subsequent move. I don't see the argument about how the rotation is worse if you replace Arrieta with Archer. The former was not very good in the second half last year, although he did have his moments in the playoffs, while the latter was quite good from May on in 2016. It isn't like Archer is a clear step down, in fact he could be a step up.
I realize you have been saying essentially this so this is not meant to argue with but to clarify.