Royals Interested In Zambrano

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Missing the point. Thanks for playing though.


zambrano-thumb-autox379-126288.jpg

When you actually show how team chemistry has prevented this team from winning the past several seasons then you might have one...
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
In the grand scheme of things, having good players, good luck, and good performances greatly outweighs whatever chemistry these guys have.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Any of you post on northsideball.com?

Dude thinks they could get Hosmer for him. :rofl:
 

bleacherbum54

GoCubsGo
Joined:
Apr 3, 2011
Posts:
2,807
Liked Posts:
641
Location:
Indianapolis
I continued to be amazed with how much people care about the chemistry and/or culture of this team as if that is the reason this team has missed the playoffs three years in a row.

If fans and ownership keep giving players like Z a pass we will probably stay the lovable losers. Cant believe people give Z a pass on what he has done.

He is way past his prime and still a cancer move along Z
 
Last edited:

bleacherbum54

GoCubsGo
Joined:
Apr 3, 2011
Posts:
2,807
Liked Posts:
641
Location:
Indianapolis
I thought winning and winning championships was the most important thing. Silly me. I forgot that it was more important for players to be warm and fuzzy. Silly me.

you cant win with the majority of your players being players like Carlos Zambrano
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
If fans and ownership keep giving players like Z a pass we will probably stay the lovable losers. Cant believe people give Z a pass on what he has done.

Keeping a talented player that causes clubhouses issues is staying lovable losers, but paying a talented player 18 million a year to go away isn't?

How many games last year did Zambrano's off the field issues cost us last year?
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
When you actually show how team chemistry has prevented this team from winning the past several seasons then you might have one...

LOL You don't comprehend any logical points anyway.

Let's keep Z and Ramirez! World Series Champs!


:yeah:
 

bleacherbum54

GoCubsGo
Joined:
Apr 3, 2011
Posts:
2,807
Liked Posts:
641
Location:
Indianapolis
Keeping a talented player that causes clubhouses issues is staying lovable losers, but paying a talented player 18 million a year to go away isn't?

How many games last year did Zambrano's off the field issues cost us last year?

HE quit on his team he was a distraction the last 1/4 of the season a exact number no body knows. But im sure guys like Demp were sick of having to answer questions and BS about Z.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
you cant win with the majority of your players being players like Carlos Zambrano

Is there any point in arguing your completely unproveable statement.

My comment is the fact that according to your statement you wouldn't watch this team if Zambrano was on it. So even if this team was winning, you wouldn't watch them when Zambrano was pitching. Ergo, you care more about the culture of this team than winning. You can cloak in these blanket statements with zero empirical evidence behind them about culture preventing winning, but culture isn't why this team hasn't made the playoffs in 3 years. Lack of talent is.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
LOL You don't comprehend any logical points anyway.

Let's keep Z and Ramirez! World Series Champs!


:yeah:

That's not really the point, but at one point, they were five outs away from the World Series and had won back-to-back division titles. But really, what have they done for us lately?
 

bleacherbum54

GoCubsGo
Joined:
Apr 3, 2011
Posts:
2,807
Liked Posts:
641
Location:
Indianapolis
That's not really the point, but at one point, they were five outs away from the World Series and had won back-to-back division titles. But really, what have they done for us lately?

Z was in his prime when we were 5 outs away from the WS plus he wasnt even close to our best pitcher or leader but he was good and at that point in his career had not quit on his team and wasnt a distraction..
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
Carlos Zambrano is: a guy with a 9-7 record and an ERA close to 5, who has serious anger management issues, puts himself before the team and quits on them...then decides he still wants to play. Promises no more outbursts and has likely the biggest temper tantrum of his career by leaving the team while the game is still going on and says he's retiring.

But, that doesn't hurt the team at all. In fact, it's a positive he gave the Cubs 9 wins. What would the Cubs have done without those 9 wins?! My goodness! We should welcome him with open arms next year, because despite how poorly he acts and never lives up to his promises, he's a great member of the team.

Clueless to the max.

/thread
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
LOL You don't comprehend any logical points anyway.

Let's keep Z and Ramirez! World Series Champs!


:yeah:

You accuse me of missing the point earlier, but the statement I made was how much I amazed on the focus on the culture of this team. I am still waiting to hear any evidence that the culture of this team was the reason this team lost 90 games last year. I love the "logic" you used there to extend that to mean that I am arguing Z and Ramirez being kept will result in a World Series championship, which is what I care most about for this team.

And by the way I love that you accuse me of being unable to comprehend logic, but your posts directed at me throughout this thread have consisted purely of the logical fallacy of ad hominem.
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Zambrano ain't too bad. When his head is in the game, he could be a top pitcher. But people don't want him anymore because he's not a team player and he's a head case.

It would make no sense to give rid of him for nothing. I'd rather pay him the 18 million to play on the North side than on the FA market or another team. He's good for at least 15 wins. I can guarantee that. Just look at what he did after the all-star a year befor lasts. Stats do tell what a pitcher can do.

Trade Z for something that will make sense or keep him istead of just giving him away, to do so. .
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Zambrano ain't too bad. When his head is in the game, he could be a top pitcher. But people don't want him anymore because he's not a team player and he's a head case.

It would make no sense to give rid of him for nothing. I'd rather pay him the 18 million to play on the North side than on the FA market or another team. He's good for at least 15 wins. I can guarantee that. Just look at what he did after the all-star a year befor lasts. Stats do tell what a pitcher can do.

Trade Z for something that will make sense or keep him istead of just giving him away, to do so. .

Yeah, that's the only thing I was arguing, is that he still can be an asset whether people think he's a time bomb or not. You don't just eat $18MM when you have options.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Yeah, that's the only thing I was arguing, is that he still can be an asset whether people think he's a time bomb or not. You don't just eat $18MM when you have options.

This would sum up my attitude towards Zambrano. He isn't a good team mate. He is overpaid for his production. It would be great if we could wave a magic wand and not have to pay Zambrano 18 million next year. But that is not the case. The argument then is what is better for the team. Paying Zambrano to play elsewhere for nothing or keeping him. The best option for this team would be to get any amount of salary relief and some prospects back for him, but that doesn't appear to be a very realistic option. So between spending 18 million for Z to pitch for the Cubs or someone else what makes this team better going forward?
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Zambrano ain't too bad. When his head is in the game, he could be a top pitcher. But people don't want him anymore because he's not a team player and he's a head case.

It would make no sense to give rid of him for nothing. I'd rather pay him the 18 million to play on the North side than on the FA market or another team. He's good for at least 15 wins. I can guarantee that. Just look at what he did after the all-star a year befor lasts. Stats do tell what a pitcher can do.

Trade Z for something that will make sense or keep him istead of just giving him away, to do so. .

Do you know what else makes no sense? :tiptoe:
 

Top