Kerfuffle
New member
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,417
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Dammit Seabrook! How anyone can believe this is a top D man in the league is beyond me.
...This team has lost all concept of team defense...
Well, the defense looked pretty good against the Sharks. The problem is, which defense is going to show on any given night.
Our top four COULD be one of the best in the league, but they sure as **** aren't this season to this point.
Look no further than our defensive corp (core? LOL) if we fail to make the playoffs.
cup hangover - there is no other explanation
Cullimore also played a real solid game.
Turco being Turco...
that is all.
Well, the defense looked pretty good against the Sharks. The problem is, which defense is going to show on any given night.
Our top four COULD be one of the best in the league, but they sure as **** aren't this season to this point.
Look no further than our defensive corp (core? LOL) if we fail to make the playoffs.
More like the defensive corpse.
cup hangover - there is no other explanation
Yeah, sure because Crawford fared SO much better behind his D.
Doesn't matter who's in goal if the D is going to give the opposition a mile to shoot the puck, not tie up sticks in front of the net and lose board battles.
Seabrook was beyond brutal at the worst possible time.
That cannot be argued.
Seabrook was beyond brutal at the worst possible time.
That cannot be argued.
Worst possible time from a game standpoint and from Seabrook's financial standpoint.
Yeah, sure because Crawford fared SO much better behind his D.
Doesn't matter who's in goal if the D is going to give the opposition a mile to shoot the puck, not tie up sticks in front of the net and lose board battles.
Really?
How about they lost half thier team? That explains a lot.
without a doubt, but it was not only him.