- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
again, more excuses.
- Status
again, more excuses.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
nobody here has said that
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
hence what I said.
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
He started with a very good Philly team, players like Roenick, Recchi, Leclair, and Gagne.
Stalberg's .5 of a season was with Toronto, can we disregard that?
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
Excuse because I have gone from what a player has said?
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
This by far is one of the dumbest sports debates.
Right now, stalberg sucks.
He will have to do more than " be good in the defensive zone " before I give him props.
If you want him on the bottom six, fine.....But dont fucking sit there and say that goals and assts dont matter when you are courting him to be on the top 6.
Right now, stalberg sucks.
He will have to do more than " be good in the defensive zone " before I give him props.
If you want him on the bottom six, fine.....But dont fucking sit there and say that goals and assts dont matter when you are courting him to be on the top 6.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
can you agree that right now, Stalberg sucks?
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
He, doesn't. You aren't providing anything to the stats, all we are seeing is posts from Dewey "Stalberg Sucks, Stalberg Sucks. I say Stalberg sucks, so he sucks."
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
just because people disagree with you doesnt make it a dumb debate...
you think he sucks, others think he has potential..
we have NEVER said Stalberg will be a stamkos type player, but I think he could definitely put up some frolik type numbers.
you are arguing like we said he will be the next gretzky...
Im just saying he will be a serviceable NHL forward
and again, he is only making $875,000.....
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,122
- Liked Posts:
- 1,642
- Location:
- Misery
Okay. Well, either way that stat doesn't say much. All it says is that Sharp was a late bloomer, we don't have any stats on Stalberg for the future so we will never know if he is a late bloomer or if he just isn't that good.
- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
Patrick Sharp also flourished pretty much right away when he got here as well. He scored 15 points in 66 games with Philly and then scored 23 points in 50 games with the Hawks. As I recall Hitchcock was the coach of the Flyers at the time and had an offensive system that really didn't fit Patrick Sharp. I want to say I read Sharp saying something along those lines after the trade was made.
I really wasn't trying to make a point about Stalberg's chances of turning into a top 6 forward. I was more struck by how similar the numbers were when I looked it up for my own curiousity.
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
With only 1.5 of season games under his belt
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
Sharp was also the 4th line center on that team. Once he got here to Chicago he was at least a top 9 and points increased, maybe due to linemates? Hmmmm :thinking:
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
So did Sharp suck because he was a late bloomer? You can't defend 1 player because he is a star and not the other.
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
I gave you the stats, but you said "goals and assts dont matter"
but he wasn't in the top 6 for those, so they dont
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
waiting....................................................
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,122
- Liked Posts:
- 1,642
- Location:
- Misery
Yeah that's a good point. And maybe that also proves that this might not be the place for Stalberg. Just like Philly wasn't the place for Sharp.
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
waiting....................................................
I'm still waiting for you on why I am making excuses for the College, and rink?
Also when I say its his 2nd full season, but you say 117 games, which really turn out to be less games than I say he's actually played.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
but he wasn't in the top 6 for those, so they dont
ok. you are right, he doesnt suck. I guess the numbers lie, I guess my eyes lie as well when I watch him try to stick handle, and shoot the puck. Keep thinking he is doesnt suck.
I will make sure to bump this thread at the end of the season.
- Status
Members online NOW
- Member
- Admin
- Mod
- Donor
- HOF
- 1ke
- AustinIllini
- bamainatlanta
- Bear Nation
- bearsfan1977
- Big Black Bear
- BornAnAngryBearsFan
- cameronkrazie86
- Canth
- Clint Eastwood
- ComeAtMeBro
- cwcwcwcw1
- Da Coach
- dennehy
- Heidenlarm
- I Just Want To Read
- IBleedBearsBlood
- jsu34
- jts1207
- JUSTFINGWIN
- lennybrisco
- Les Grossman
- LiverpoolBearsFAn
- MikeDitkaPolishSausage
- Neckbeard
- NoCourtesyFlush
- Payton34Sayers40
- puckthefackers
- remydat
- Rise
- Robocop 80
- satchice
- Sittingonacornflake
- Starscreacher
- thenewguy
- This Post Is Terrible
- TL1961
- wklink
- wonky73
- Yogi
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up