The All-Purpose Stalberg Threadapolluza

Status
Not open for further replies.

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I'm still waiting for you on why I am making excuses for the College, and rink?

Also when I say its his 2nd full season, but you say 117 games, which really turn out to be less games than I say he's actually played.

maybe it will take a "few" more games or a season or 2 to become good. but right now he sucks. just because he has fucking potential, doesnt mean at the current time that he doesnt suck. what dont you get?
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
Yeah that's a good point. And maybe that also proves that this might not be the place for Stalberg. Just like Philly wasn't the place for Sharp.

He was the 4th line center. It was also well known Ken Hitchcock didn't like young guys on the roster. The example even goes to Columbus when their young star left to play in the KHL because Hitchcock told him the veterans deserve his playing time, even though he is out-performing them.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Sharpy & Softberg in the same sentence. :rofl:

Since 06, Sharpy has scored 20+ goals each season.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
maybe it will take a "few" more games or a season or 2 to become good. but right now he sucks. just because he has fucking potential, doesnt mean at the current time that he doesnt suck. what dont you get?

Way to not answer anything I asked. Examples show it took Sharp time to develop. Tim thomas took lots of time to develop.
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
So did Sharp suck because he was a late bloomer? You can't defend 1 player because he is a star and not the other.

I never said that that Sharp sucked because he was a late bloomer. And if Stalberg is one, then in a year or two I'll see that. Right now Stalberg isn't very good. In a few years, who knows.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
I never said that that Sharp sucked because he was a late bloomer. And if Stalberg is one, then in a year or two I'll see that. Right now Stalberg isn't very good. In a few years, who knows.

well then, what makes Stalberg not good?
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
again, potential is what it is, potential. you are not good or great based on potential, you are good or great by what you have shown up until the current time.

If you dont think he sucks currently, than Im done arguing with you about this.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
maybe it will take a "few" more games or a season or 2 to become good. but right now he sucks. just because he has fucking potential, doesnt mean at the current time that he doesnt suck. what dont you get?

nobody is arguing that he is good right now....he is developing, thats what we are saying...the jury is still out on him
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
again, potential is what it is, potential. you are not good or great based on potential, you are good or great by what you have shown up until the current time.

If you dont think he sucks currently, than Im done arguing with you about this.

Well what sucks about him, because he doesn't score top 6 points with 4th line minutes?

Can I have any kind of answer yet?
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
^^ well thats what im saying anyway
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
nobody is arguing that he is good right now....he is developing, thats what we are saying...the jury is still out on him

Actually when I asked Icehog if stalberg sucks currently, he would not agree and continued to argue.
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
nobody is arguing that he is good right now....he is developing, thats what we are saying...the jury is still out on him

This is basically what I think about Stalberg and yet you're one of the guys arguing with me. I'm saying that right now he hasn't done much and he might be good and just take longer to develop, but he could also end up being worthless.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
Right Now? He's basically useless. In my opinion, he hasn't done much to help the team.

How is he useless, He became reliable defensively, He learned to be more physical and knock people off the puck? Again this is how the Hawks wanted him to develop with his size. They want him to be a physical presence, mix that with his speed and he "could" turn into a hell of a forechecker.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
Actually when I asked Icehog if stalberg sucks currently, he would not agree and continued to argue.

yet I still don't have an answer from you on why he does. Joe? is that you on Dewey's computer? Let Dewey on now please
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Then remind me, or is it just because you say he sucks?

are you insane? you just thanked tbos post about arguing if he is good, and you are back to this. wow.

Well i guess you want stats, but you wont again allow me to use stats :rolleyes:

anyway......again. speed should never be confused with skating abilty, his hands are horrible, he has no skill on shots, let alone good shot selection, often left in no mans land or in bad positions that lead to him getting off a bad shot.

Will stalberg always suck? dont know
Does stalberg have potential? yes
does stalberg suck currently? yes


^^^^^^^^^^^^ very simple.

and since I have been giving example of how he sucks, even the stats that dont matter according to you like goals and assists. Now its your turn, Why does he not suck? or are you going to back peddle or forget what you are talking about and thank the same tbo post from above.

Im going to play a game of COD, when I comeback try to have something more than "oh he plays good in the defensive end" "oh he had a lot of hit" ( while being on a soft team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top