beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,750
- Liked Posts:
- 3,741
So Peter Gammons said on the Score today that Cubs interest in Verlander was mild to non existent and who Theo was really asking about was Michael Fulmer. Obviously he's a better pitcher than any we've discussed, even if Archer has more of a track record, but if you're Al Avila to you entertain offers? If I were him I would. They're the near copy of the 2013 Phillies, a bad team saddled with bad contracts for guys who are unlikely to be moved for much. A 5 year rebuild would require being crazy aggressive and Avila himself might not survive it. That said if I'm him I absolutely listen, but I get the realities. I seriously doubt the Cubs could offer enough to offset the negativity that the Tigers would have to endure, particularly since young pitchers have injury risks which certainly would affect any offer, so I don't think this is going to happen but it's a very interesting scenario in the modern baseball landscape. You could say that if Ruben Amaro Jr. had been ruthlessly aggressive in 2013 he might still be the GM in Philly instead of the 1B coach for the Red Sox.
I'm glad to see this seems to be where theo's head is. I'm not sure there are a ton of guys out there like Fulmer but I'd almost be inclined to pay more than you think they should go for rather than fighting this uphill battle when they are actually on the market. That's one of the reasons I threw out Daniel Norris as a guy. He seems more gettable than Fulmer.