Brenly Won't Miss Ramirez

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
Why not actually provide an argument to counter my points? I realize that would require waymore effort than a dewey :rolleyes: but perhaps we might actual get somewhere instead of hearing the same tired statements without any evidence to support it.

Same goes for you and your hard-on for Ramirez.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Same goes for you and your hard-on for Ramirez.

I didn't realize I posted one line responses with an :rolleyes: as a response to an argument. My mistake.

That and you continue to ignore what I actual wrote which is that Ramirez is the best option available at the time. I am still waiting for that reasonable better option...
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
I didn't realize I posted one line responses with an :rolleyes: as a response to an argument. My mistake.

That and you continue to ignore what I actual wrote which is that Ramirez is the best option available at the time. I am still waiting for that reasonable better option...

You're repeating the same shtick. Ramirez is good in the season, sucks when it counts. Simple as that. He's not worth $16M. Period.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
You're repeating the same shtick. Ramirez is good in the season, sucks when it counts. Simple as that. He's not worth $16M. Period.

And I've shown again and again how that isn't really true. You say the same thing again and again. And I give example of how postseason production doesn't reflect the talent level of the player. I am not syaing that we should be happy that Ramirez sucked in the postseason in 2007 and 2008, but the idea that has any bearing on how he would produce in future postseasons is not supported by any evidence.
 

Mr. Cub

2016 World Series Champs!
Joined:
Dec 13, 2010
Posts:
4,854
Liked Posts:
1,036
Location:
Earth
He was good in the 2003 post season.. So it just depends. Plus the Cubs as a whole team sucked in 07-08.
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
You're repeating the same shtick. Ramirez is good in the season, sucks when it counts. Simple as that. He's not worth $16M. Period.

So he rough time in 2, 3 game series. thats the way to judge a player :lmao:

A-Ram has been the best 3B prolly in Cubs history. I will do some stat checking but im postitive this guy put up better numbers then Santo
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
And I've shown again and again how that isn't really true. You say the same thing again and again. And I give example of how postseason production doesn't reflect the talent level of the player. I am not syaing that we should be happy that Ramirez sucked in the postseason in 2007 and 2008, but the idea that has any bearing on how he would produce in future postseasons is not supported by any evidence.
And conversely we have no evidence that Ramirez's postseason production will increase.

The only thing we have is the past.

Ramirez puts up great numbers, the only thing this season they came in May and later when the season was out of hand already.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
And I've shown again and again how that isn't really true. You say the same thing again and again. And I give example of how postseason production doesn't reflect the talent level of the player. I am not syaing that we should be happy that Ramirez sucked in the postseason in 2007 and 2008, but the idea that has any bearing on how he would produce in future postseasons is not supported by any evidence.

Ok. That's what you believe and that's fine. I believe otherwise. Doesn't make either of us wrong until he shows that he can do something other than flop in the postseason. Agree to disagree on Ramirez.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
And conversely we have no evidence that Ramirez's postseason production will increase.

The only thing we have is the past.

Ramirez puts up great numbers, the only thing this season they came in May and later when the season was out of hand already.

Right we don't know what will happen in the postseason. So judging a player based on what happened in past postseasons is silly because he is as likely to perform at his career numbers in the postseason as he is to have another clunker.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
So he rough time in 2, 3 game series. thats the way to judge a player :lmao:

A-Ram has been the best 3B prolly in Cubs history. I will do some stat checking but im postitive this guy put up better numbers then Santo

Ron Santo says hello.
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
And conversely we have no evidence that Ramirez's postseason production will increase.

The only thing we have is the past.

Ramirez puts up great numbers, the only thing this season they came in May and later when the season was out of hand already.

A-Ram needs help to keep it close around May. A-ram has always been known to be slow starter. I want to see you hit HR when its 50 degrees or lower and wind blowing in every damn day.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Ok. That's what you believe and that's fine. I believe otherwise. Doesn't make either of us wrong until he shows that he can do something other than flop in the postseason. Agree to disagree on Ramirez.

I understand that you don't like Ramirez, but I will call out a flawed argument when I see one. I've shown how great players have had poor postseasons. I've shown how players have had poor postseason and than great postseasons. Hitting in the postseason is not a skill. Over time guys numbers will approach their career norms and there is no evidence offered by anyone here to suggest otherwise.

If you want to get rid of Ramirez because you don't like his attitude or his production in past postseasons, that is fine. But don't try to sell it like this improves the team right now.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
A-Ram needs help to keep it close around May. A-ram has always been known to be slow starter. I want to see you hit HR when its 50 degrees or lower and wind blowing in every damn day.

Fisch isn't a baseball player. :lmao:

So he's a slow starter and a slow finisher too, huh?
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Right we don't know what will happen in the postseason. So judging a player based on what happened in past postseasons is silly because he is as likely to perform at his career numbers in the postseason as he is to have another clunker.
I'd like to think his averages in the postseason would come closer to 290 25 and 90, but I don't know that for sure. Sample size and short series prevent that from happening.

If the Cubs want pretty regular season numbers, they'll resign Ramirez, if they want to spend money in other areas, they won't.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
Santo had 14 years while A-Ram only 8. A-ram has put up basically same type of numbers as Santo in about 3 less years in MLB

Santo was consistent throughout his entire career, played defense too.
 

Top