- Joined:
- Nov 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 25,053
- Liked Posts:
- 11,503
My favorite teams
I didn't know people grew on trees.Highly doubtful the Phils let Hamels go.
LHP's like him don't grow on trees.
I didn't know people grew on trees.Highly doubtful the Phils let Hamels go.
LHP's like him don't grow on trees.
I didn't know people grew on trees.
Why not actually provide an argument to counter my points? I realize that would require waymore effort than a dewey but perhaps we might actual get somewhere instead of hearing the same tired statements without any evidence to support it.
Same goes for you and your hard-on for Ramirez.
Same goes for you and your hard-on for Ramirez.
I didn't realize I posted one line responses with an as a response to an argument. My mistake.
That and you continue to ignore what I actual wrote which is that Ramirez is the best option available at the time. I am still waiting for that reasonable better option...
You're repeating the same shtick. Ramirez is good in the season, sucks when it counts. Simple as that. He's not worth $16M. Period.
You're repeating the same shtick. Ramirez is good in the season, sucks when it counts. Simple as that. He's not worth $16M. Period.
And conversely we have no evidence that Ramirez's postseason production will increase.And I've shown again and again how that isn't really true. You say the same thing again and again. And I give example of how postseason production doesn't reflect the talent level of the player. I am not syaing that we should be happy that Ramirez sucked in the postseason in 2007 and 2008, but the idea that has any bearing on how he would produce in future postseasons is not supported by any evidence.
And I've shown again and again how that isn't really true. You say the same thing again and again. And I give example of how postseason production doesn't reflect the talent level of the player. I am not syaing that we should be happy that Ramirez sucked in the postseason in 2007 and 2008, but the idea that has any bearing on how he would produce in future postseasons is not supported by any evidence.
And conversely we have no evidence that Ramirez's postseason production will increase.
The only thing we have is the past.
Ramirez puts up great numbers, the only thing this season they came in May and later when the season was out of hand already.
So he rough time in 2, 3 game series. thats the way to judge a player :lmao:
A-Ram has been the best 3B prolly in Cubs history. I will do some stat checking but im postitive this guy put up better numbers then Santo
And conversely we have no evidence that Ramirez's postseason production will increase.
The only thing we have is the past.
Ramirez puts up great numbers, the only thing this season they came in May and later when the season was out of hand already.
Ok. That's what you believe and that's fine. I believe otherwise. Doesn't make either of us wrong until he shows that he can do something other than flop in the postseason. Agree to disagree on Ramirez.
A-Ram needs help to keep it close around May. A-ram has always been known to be slow starter. I want to see you hit HR when its 50 degrees or lower and wind blowing in every damn day.
Ron Santo says hello.
I'd like to think his averages in the postseason would come closer to 290 25 and 90, but I don't know that for sure. Sample size and short series prevent that from happening.Right we don't know what will happen in the postseason. So judging a player based on what happened in past postseasons is silly because he is as likely to perform at his career numbers in the postseason as he is to have another clunker.
Santo had 14 years while A-Ram only 8. A-ram has put up basically same type of numbers as Santo in about 3 less years in MLB