If blocking people would also hide their threads...

[ruprecht]

Good point, Milton. The shoopster's been thinking about this thread. I don't think we want to resort to outright censorship, but maybe a bunch'a guys could organize themselves, maybe into a sort of message board "gang," and when they see a post from someone they don't like, they could all get together in the thread and go after the OP. Not with facts or anything like that, but they could make fun of him and call him names and generally derail any discussion they don't like.

They could even give their group a name, maybe something connected with The Bears in some way. Like, for instance, they could call themselves "The Soldiers" . . .

Exhibit A

 

[Teddy KGB]

Good point, Milton. The shoopster's been thinking about this thread. I don't think we want to resort to outright censorship, but maybe a bunch'a guys could organize themselves, maybe into a sort of message board "gang," and when they see a post from someone they don't like, they could all get together in the thread and go after the OP. Not with facts or anything like that, but they could make fun of him and call him names and generally derail any discussion they don't like.

They could even give their group a name, maybe something connected with The Bears in some way. Like, for instance, they could call themselves "The Soldiers" . . .

Novak and his 25 alts already have that covered.

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

 

[Foreign Banana]

I have been taking impressions that the boards of messages have been designed for the peoples to communicate with each other. Why should website have ways to ignore the peoples when not ignoring the peoples is purpose of website? That much like sitting inside bathtub with no water. Why not sit on couch instead of bathtub?

Where I was born many peoples say "Many red blankets on bed bring shame to goose with small feathers."

(it sound much more nice in native tongue)

It mean computer have power off option for reason.

 

[xer0h0ur]

I have been taking impressions that the boards of messages have been designed for the peoples to communicate with each other. Why should website have ways to ignore the peoples when not ignoring the peoples is purpose of website? That much like sitting inside bathtub with no water. Why not sit on couch instead of bathtub?

Where I was born many peoples say "Many red blankets on bed bring shame to goose with small feathers."

(it sound much more nice in native tongue)

It mean computer have power off option for reason.

Who are you? Confucius?

 

[Myk]

I opened this thread and just scrolled through 5 pages consisting of no posts I could read. Having everyone on ignore makes it so much quicker to get through these threads but I have no idea about what the thread is about.

And your life is better for it.

 

[shoopster]

I have been taking impressions that the boards of messages have been designed for the peoples to communicate with each other. Why should website have ways to ignore the peoples when not ignoring the peoples is purpose of website? That much like sitting inside bathtub with no water. Why not sit on couch instead of bathtub?

Where I was born many peoples say "Many red blankets on bed bring shame to goose with small feathers."

(it sound much more nice in native tongue)

It mean computer have power off option for reason.

Damn, I was bettin' on this bit lasting longer than 22 posts before it went in the shitter . . .

 

[ruprecht]

Who are you? Confucius?

An alt that is not gaining traction

 

[Hawkeye OG]

Did everyone miss their nap today?

 

[ruprecht]

Did everyone miss their nap today?

Ignored

 

[Mjiton]

:whoosh:

Stop picking on me or I will put you on ignore, and report you, and dislike you, and whatever else you guys want CCS to give you. I want this to be my safe place you bully.

:whoosh::whoosh:

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

Ignored

Baby

 

[Mjiton]

Macho asshole routines gets old and pathetic. I can't blame people for wanting to block cancerous posters who post nothing of value.
Look how tough I am. "Triggered snowflake liberal pussies." #flex

maybe they should make a snowflake sub forum here so all the pussies wont get triggered.. maybe there can be coloring books?

Such a limited internet tough guy vocabulary. Straight out of the "How to shame people" dictionary for the mentally disabled. #Old

 

[Mjiton]

Good point, Milton. The shoopster's been thinking about this thread. I don't think we want to resort to outright censorship, but maybe a bunch'a guys could organize themselves, maybe into a sort of message board "gang," and when they see a post from someone they don't like, they could all get together in the thread and go after the OP. Not with facts or anything like that, but they could make fun of him and call him names and generally derail any discussion they don't like.

They could even give their group a name, maybe something connected with The Bears in some way. Like, for instance, they could call themselves "The Soldiers" . . .

Hey Poopster who is Milton? Anyway while I understand you are calling back to the CBMB you have to look no further than the posters in this thread who all came together to thrash the OP. They just haven't given themselves a moniker yet. That seems to be your forte, is it not?

 

[Adipost]

No, more pointing out the humor in the fact that every whiny bitch on the forum that cannot seem to just scroll past a posters post if they do not like it and must click that reply button and take issue with it thank banged Xer0. Interesting how telling those thanks are.

LOL. Aren’t you the same dude who got super offended when I used the term Stockholm Syndrome to describe John Fox? Something aboot me being insensitive to people who actually have it.

 

[Burque]

LOL. Aren’t you the same dude who got super offended when I used the term Stockholm Syndrome to describe John Fox? Something aboot me being insensitive to people who actually have it.

I might have told you that Stockholm syndrome is a real thing that you made light of for no reason. Not at all similar to whiny bitches on the internet attempting to censor anyone that isn't in their sewing circle.



Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Myk]

I might have told you that Stockholm syndrome is a real thing that you made light of for no reason. Not at all similar to whiny bitches on the internet attempting to censor anyone that isn't in their sewing circle.

Blocking isn't at all similar to censoring. A free speech doesn't mean people have to listen.
And a knitting circle isn't at all similar to a sewing bee.

 

[Newblood]

I might have told you that Stockholm syndrome is a real thing that you made light of for no reason. Not at all similar to whiny bitches on the internet attempting to censor anyone that isn't in their sewing circle.



Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Lmao. You are still in here crying? :clap:

 

[Burque]

Blocking isn't at all similar to censoring. A free speech doesn't mean people have to listen.
And a knitting circle isn't at all similar to a sewing bee.

Ftr people are already allowed to block people on this message board.

The people here are requesting censorship.

There is a difference. Get it straight.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Burque]

Lmao. You are still in here crying? :clap:

And you are still here advocating censorship. That's real American of you.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Newblood]

Ftr people are already allowed to block people on this message board.

The people here are requesting censorship.

There is a difference. Get it straight.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

This is a private site you baby. If they want to ban every damn person for using the word "Bears", they have that right.

Your freedom of speech here only extends as far as the owners want to allow.

ZOMG, don't censor my CCS e-voice.