- Joined:
- Aug 16, 2011
- Posts:
- 22,174
- Liked Posts:
- 11,865
- Location:
- Favorite Corner Bar
My favorite teams
I just felt a little dirty thanking Packer Fan for his post
LOL @ Guapo once again making himself look like a Special person.
I just felt a little dirty thanking Packer Fan for his post
I'm not that bad. Sure I hold an unpopular opinion in the Redskins situation but outside of that I'm here to talk about the Bears and football in general.
I haven't answered your ridiculous question because you are leaving out an important piece, but to shut you up...Yes it is, now that we have that out the way answer my question, is 48>23? Would starting in 25 more games than another player allow that player to produce exponentially more than the other? Let's hear your excuses start to roll in.
And I didn't say you did either, learn to read...I said you made it out as if he beat out a top 10 QB...Locker didn't beat out a better QB, Locker beat out a Hasselbeck who was at the tail end of his career and is happy playing as a backup. Alex Smith is still a starter for a good team, even after Kap beat him out for the starting job. So unlike Hasselbeck who Locker beat out, Smith is still regarded as a starter caliber QB.
See above...and answer my question of is 48>23? a simple yes or no will do thank you. Everyone on this forum will get a kick out of your excuse...because despite what you are trying to convince yourself, I haven't made any excuse...I have just used an actual brain to show that your Special person logic of just comparing careers vs actually looking at the games starter is exactly that....Special person.
Saw you finally admit 28>7!:shot:Thanks for finally admitting your idiocy when it comes to production after the 6th time.
If you bothered to read I have already stated that Cam has started more games but for some reason Kap couldn't beat out a qb who has been benched a couple of times while Locker "didn't beat out a better qb" you say?Stopped reading there. It is getting embarassing how you are trying to spin your sad argument by saying Hasselbeck was not a better qb. It only shows how idiotic you sound trying to save face when you spew before you think.
Thank those kids for solving that rocket science problem of Cam having 4 TIMES the productivity on those TDs and thanks again for finally admitting 28>7. You are the best and I am satisfied with your amazing logic
Mine is more for your avatar...I remember going ape shit at the end of that game. Then, I knew it was going to be a bad year if we lost to the Packers at Lambeau.
2011 (the year Kap and Locker were drafted)
Alex Smith - 3144 yards, 17 TD's, 5 Int's, 61.3 comp %, 90.7 passer rating
Hasselbeck - 3571 yards, 18 TD's, 14 Int's, 61.6 comp %, 82.4 passer rating
2012
Alex Smith - 1737 yards, 13 TD's, 5 Int's, 70.2 comp %, 104.1 passer rating
Hasselbeck - 1367 yards, 7 TD's, 5 Int's, 62.4 comp %, 81.0 passer rating
2013
Alex Smith - 3313 yards, 23 TD's, 7 Int's, 60.6 comp %, 89.1 passer rating
Hasselbeck - 130 yards, 0 TD's, 1 Int, 58.3 comp %, 61.1 passer rating
In the past 3 years Alex Smith has out performed Hasselbeck not only in efficiency but in production...so if you feel that Hasselbeck was good in 2011-2013, than Alex Smith is a much better QB. So Locker did beat out a worse QB than what Kap did. And that doesn't include the fact that in 2011 Alex Smith was the starter for a team that made it to the NFCCG, in 2012 the Niners were 6-2-1 before he was injured and Kap took over, and then in 2013 was the starter for a Chiefs team that went 11-5 and made the playoffs where in the previous year had only won 2 games. But please keep trying to convince yourself that Hasselbeck was the better QB when Locker and Kap entered the league.
Dude....just stop. You are really showing how desperate one can get when you just can't admit the reality of the situation. You took a huge step in admitting 28>7....good job
Hasselbeck was a 3 time pro bowler at the time. He has 34,647 passing yards, 201 TDs, over 60% comp, and 82.1 passer %
Alex Smith had been benched 3 times, had the worst TD/INT ratio in 2005 with 1 TD and 11 INTS (that is not a typo), had the worst passer % to Kellen Clements in 2007.
He has a whopping 17,593 passing yards, 104 TDs, UNDER 60% comp, and 81 passer %
Hasselbeck is better in all those areas in addition to being a very good pro bowl qb. Smith is not. Sorry bud, nobody that doesn't live in your fantasy world would agree that Smith was better than Hasselbeck.
Oh...by the way. Here is your little average argument to blow up your own productivity #s....again
Hasselbeck avg 228 yards per game >>> Smith's 195 ( that is under 200 per game for that better qb):kick:
Hasselbeck 1.32 TDs per game >> Smith's 1.15
Keep making horrible posts and blowing up your own dribble. Your idiocy is just plain boring but keep coming up with excuses why Kap couldn't beat out a manager who has been benched a lot while Locker beat out a multiple pro bowler.
P.S. 28 is 4 ×7 :shot::shot::shot: Thanks again
Ironically enough even with Smith's turd of a rookie season if you compare career numbers(rate wise) Smith and Hasselbeck are almost indistinguishable.This post might even be more Special person than his last one....
And that's saying something!
But in regards to Smith vs Hasselbeck
8>5
Ironically enough even with Smith's turd of a rookie season if you compare career numbers(rate wise) Smith and Hasselbeck are almost indistinguishable.
That's funny...considering how Guano is making Hasselbeck out as a world beater
Keep making horrible posts and blowing up your own dribble. Your idiocy is just plain boring but keep coming up with excuses why Kap couldn't beat out a manager who has been benched a lot while Locker beat out a multiple pro bowler.
Is this kinda like calling Cutler a pro bowl QB?
Remember how well Hasselbeck played against the Bears in 2012?